网站导航   4000-006-150  
小站教育
学生选择在小站备考:30天 524633名,今日申请2216人    备考咨询 >>

SAT写作官方样题高分范文:Let there be dark(2)

2017年04月05日16:38 来源:小站教育作者:小站SAT编辑
参与(1) 阅读(5889)
摘要:小站SAT频道为大家带来SAT写作高分作文精华汇总,每个话题分享给大家考生的高分作文学习,模仿。本文的范文得分是2 1 1,文末有给出得分分析,希望对大家SAT备考有所帮助。

本文给大家分享SAT写作样题“Let there be dark”的一篇范文,本文得分211,作文题目及更多分数段范文,请点击入口

SAT写作官方样题高分范文:Let there be dark(2)图1

本话题各分数段范文汇总及解读,请点击进入


Sample Student Essays of “Let There Be Dark.” ©2012 by Los Angeles Times. Originally published December 21, 2012.

Scores: 211

Bogard builds an argument to persuade his audience about what he is concering about and feels it important to take care about. His essay talks about so much facts about sleeping how so little can effect us health wise examples like getting sleep disorders, diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression. This facts helps people persuade the audience he also say that the world health organization classifies working night shift is bad. In his argument is not all about how it bad for the body he also claims and have proof that light cost are expensive and really costing people because they have light all night long. He also claims light is messing with mother nature that animals need darkness to feed eat move around because there noctuaral creatures. He has details facts about human body, animals and about mother nature that he can use to support his idea of not using so much light at night and how we need darkness. With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for us. He was all of facts and examples that he claim is efficting us and there world.

This response scored a 2/1/1.

Reading—2: This response demonstrates some comprehension of the source text, although the writer’s understanding of Bogard’s central idea isn’t conveyed until the latter part of the essay, where the writer indicates that Bogard includes details facts about human body, animals and about mother nature that he can use to support his idea of not using so much light at night and how we need darkness. Prior to this, the writer has included details from the text, but without contextualizing these details within Bogard’s broader argument, suggesting that the writer is relaying ideas from the text without much understanding of how they contribute to the whole. For example, the writer mentions the health problems cited in the text, that working the night shift is classified as bad, and that light costs are high, but doesn’t explain how these points relate to Bogard’s main claim that we must preserve natural darkness. On the whole, this essay displays only a partial understanding of the source text.

Analysis—1: In this essay, the writer has merely identified aspects of Bogard’s use of evidence without explaining how the evidence contributes to the argument. The writer notes that Bogard’s text talks about so much facts about sleeping how so little can effect us health wise examples like getting sleep disorders, diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression. This facts helps people persuade the audience. Other than identifying these as persuasive facts, however, the writer does nothing to indicate an understanding of the analytical task. The writer again mentions persuasion before the conclusion of the essay (With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for us), but once again, there is no explanation of how or why these features are persuasive. Thus, the essay offers inadequate analysis of Bogard’s text.

Writing—1: This response demonstrates little cohesion and inadequate skill in the use and control of language. From the outset, problems with language control impede the writer’s ability to establish a clear central claim (Bogard builds an argument to persuade his audience about what he is concering about and feels it important to take care about). The response also lacks a recognizable introduction and conclusion, and sentences are strung together without a clear progression of ideas (for much of the response, the writer merely lists claims Bogard makes). The response also lacks variety in sentence structures, in part because of repetitive transitions. (For example, he also claims is used two sentences in a row in this brief response). Weak control of the conventions of standard written English, coupled with vague word choice, undermine the quality of writing. Overall, this response has demonstrated inadequate writing skill.

特别申明:本文来自于小站教育【SAT写作】专栏,转载请以超链接形式标注本文出处,并附上此申明,否则将追究法律责任。

SAT/ACT备考资料免费领取

免费领取
看完仍有疑问?想要更详细的答案?
备考问题一键咨询提分方案
获取专业解答

相关文章

2012年至2015年所有SAT作文真题汇总 2篇对比例文教你在SAT写作中‘指出Evidence并深度... 【SAT写作】勇气类话题的写作思路和必背短语与句子 2012至2014年度SAT考试Essay话题集合 【SAT写作】科技类话题例子资料分享 SAT阅读文章之移民类话题讲解(二) 如何展开对SAT写作话题的论述?3个切入点全知道 SAT写作考试高频话题:创新类写作真题汇总
版权申明| 隐私保护| 意见反馈| 联系我们| 关于我们| 网站地图| 最新资讯
© 2011-2024 ZHAN.com All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备13042692号-23 举报电话:4000-006-150
沪公网安备 31010602002658号
增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20180682